The Permian diapsid reptiles Acerosodontosaurus and Claudiosaurus are not stem-turtles: Morphological and fossil phylogenetic analyses must take a cautious, holistic approach toward turtle origins

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55632/pwvas.v92i1.626

Keywords:

Fossil reptiles, phylogenetics, turtle origins, diapsid reptiles, Claudiosaurus, Acerosodontosaurus, tetrapod evolution

Abstract

Turtle origins remains a debated topic in evolutionary biology. Molecular data uniformly supports a turtle-archosaur clade; morphological data has supported multiple hypotheses including a turtle-lepidosaur clade, turtles as the sister to a archosaur-lepidosaur clade (within or outside of Diapsida), and rarely, a turtle-archosaur clade as in molecular studies. Several recent analyses have revealed heterodox hypotheses concerning tetrapod relationships, chiefly regarding the arrangement of fossil taxa (paradoxically, some of these hypotheses may help resolve the molecular-morphological conflict). Examining different morphological data sets has revealed common problems that undermine confidence in the analytical results: 1) character construction (no character ordering, multiple homologies within a single character series, vaguely constructed characters), 2) insufficient character sampling, and 3) insufficient taxon sampling.

A recent analysis addressing turtle origins provides a textbook example of these problems. The analysis recovered the following novel results: the diapsid reptile Acerosodontosaurus (Late Permian, Madagascar) as a sister to the contemporaneous and sympatric Claudiosaurus, recovered both species as early fossil relatives of turtles, and supported Testudines(Archosauria+Lepidosauria). Careful and detailed examination of that data set reveals all of the above issues are present. Further, re-running that data set, without correcting these issues, revealed that none of their findings were replicable. Additionally, results from a re-analysis of the data set correcting these issues revealed no support for their hypothesized relationships.

Solving the origin of turtles using morphological data will require a cautious and thoughtful approach toward character construction and a more holistic sampling of characters and taxa throughout the tetrapod tree.

Author Biographies

Nicholas M. Gardner, West Virginia University-Potomac State College

Mary F. Shipper Library, Staff Librarian

Nathan E. Van Vranken, West Virginia University-Potomac State College

STEM Division, Visiting instructor of geology and biology

Downloads

Published

2020-04-29

How to Cite

Gardner, N. M., & Van Vranken, N. E. (2020). The Permian diapsid reptiles Acerosodontosaurus and Claudiosaurus are not stem-turtles: Morphological and fossil phylogenetic analyses must take a cautious, holistic approach toward turtle origins. Proceedings of the West Virginia Academy of Science, 92(1). https://doi.org/10.55632/pwvas.v92i1.626

Issue

Section

Meeting Abstracts-Oral