A Simple and Inexpensive Downdraft Table to Limit Aerosol Exposure from Patients, Aerosol-Generating Procedures, and Surgical Smoke
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55632/pwvas.v95i1.946Keywords:
aerosol, aerosol-generating procedure, occupational safety, ventilation, surgeryAbstract
Pathogenic aerosols are common, especially in clinical settings. Aerosols are released from quiet and forced respiration, non-respiratory movements (e.g., coughing and sneezing), aerosol-generating procedures, and surgical smoke plumes. Aerosols may contain viruses (e.g., coronaviruses, influenza viruses, adenoviruses) and bacteria (e.g., Streptococcus pneumoniae, Stapylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Mycobacterium tuberculosis). Surgical smoke plumes may contain harmful volatile organic compounds (e.g., formaldehyde), viral particles (e.g., human papillomavirus), or cancerous cells. Thus, the containment of airborne pathogenic organisms, xenobiotics, and bioaerosols is of the utmost importance. Yet, despite the importance of negative airflow and exhaust ventilation, many clinical environments do not have adequate ventilation systems— often due to significant monetary expenses or other barriers to access such as remote locations. Recently, a relatively inexpensive downdraft table (< 200 USD), made of wood, tarps, rebar, and corrugated steel roofing material and a simple local exhaust ventilation system (~ 300 USD) have been demonstrated to eliminate airborne VOCs, including VOCs found in surgical smoke. However, the table has not been assessed regarding the capacity to remove water-based aerosols. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to assess the ability of the downdraft table and local exhaust ventilation system to exhaust varied water-based and organic aerosols. The study identifies that a simple and inexpensive downdraft table can effectively exhaust aerosols like those found in clinical environments. This study represents an innovation in accessible medical technology that will improve health and safety in regions that include developing countries and remote locations.
References
Bhattacharjee HK, Chaliyadan S, Verma E, Ramachandran R, Makharia G, Parshad R. Coronavirus disease 2019 and laparoscopic surgery in resource-limited settings. 2021. Asian J Endosc Surg. 14(2):305-308. doi:10.1111/ases.12835
Donato G, Forti E, Mutignani M, et al. 2021. A multicenter survey on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during the COVID-19 pandemic in northern and central Italy. Endosc Int Open. 9(4):E629-E634. doi:10.1055/a-1380-3419
Hellman S., Chen G.H., Irie T. 2020. Rapid clearing of aerosol in an intubation box by vacuum filtration. Br J Anaesth. 125:e296-e299.
Jain R, Kroboth S, Ignatowski D, Khandheria BK. 2021. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody in Echocardiography and Stress Laboratory. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 8(2):146-150.
Klein RC, King C, Castagna P. 2014. Controlling formaldehyde exposures in an academic gross anatomy laboratory. J Occup Environ Hyg 11:127–132.
Klompas M., Baker M., Rhee C. 2021. What Is an Aerosol-Generating Procedure?. JAMA Surg. 156:113-114.
Komperda J, Peyvan A, Li D, et al. 2021. Computer simulation of the SARS-CoV-2 contamination risk in a large dental clinic. Phys Fluids (1994). 33(3):033328. doi:10.1063/5.0043934
Lee T, Soo JC, LeBouf RF, et al. 2018. Surgical smoke control with local exhaust ventilation: Experimental study. J Occup Environ Hyg. 15(4):341-350. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1422082
Mowbray NG, Ansell J, Horwood J, et al. 2020. Safe management of surgical smoke in the age of COVID-19. Br J Surg. 107(11):1406-1413. doi:10.1002/bjs.11679
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Surgical Suite. https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/hospital/surgical/surgical.html
Romanzi A, Gabaglio M, Milanesi M, et al. 2021. Pain distraction during awake low anterior resection and Cuddle Delivery initiative for inpatient: frugal procedural options to support surgery in the COVID-19 era. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 25(7):3116-3121. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202104_25566
Sinnige JS, Kooij FO, van Schuppen H, Hollmann MW, Sperna Weiland NH. 2021. Protection of healthcare workers during aerosol-generating procedures with local exhaust ventilation [published online ahead of print, 2021 Mar 20]. Br J Anaesth. S0007-0912(21)00166-5. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2021.02.032
Tkacik PT, Dahlberg JL, Johnson JE, Hoth JJ, Szer RA, Hellman SE. 2021. Sizing of airborne particles in an operating room. PLoS One. 16(4):e0249586.
Ulmer BC. 2008. The hazards of surgical smoke. AORN J. 87(4):721-738. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2007.10.012
Weiland NHS, Traversari RAAL, Sinnige JS. 2021. Influence of room ventilation settings on aerosol clearance and distribution. Br J Anaesth. 126:E49–E52
Wilson NM, Marks GB, Eckhardt A, et al. 2021. The effect of respiratory activity, non-invasive respiratory support and facemasks on aerosol generation and its relevance to COVID-19 [published online ahead of print, 2021 Mar 30]. Anaesthesia. 2021;10.1111/anae.15475. doi:10.1111/anae.15475
Zdilla MJ. 2020. Creating a Human Gross Anatomy Laboratory: The Experience at a Primarily Undergraduate Institution. Anat Sci Educ. 13(5):636-647. doi:10.1002/ase.1946
Zdilla MJ. 2021. Local exhaust ventilation systems for the gross anatomy laboratory. Morphologie. 105(350):237-246. doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2020.11.002.
Zdilla MJ. 2022. Creating an inexpensive yet effective downdraft table for a gross anatomy laboratory: Proof-of-concept. Morphologie. 106(352):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2021.02.009.
Zdilla MJ, Goldsmith WT, Nurkiewicz TR. 2022a. Removal of an Aerosolized 35% Triethylene Glycol and Water Mixture from Fog Machines Directed Along the Width of a Novel Downdraft Table (Version 1). figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19890250.v1
Zdilla MJ, Goldsmith WT, Nurkiewicz TR. 2022b. Removal of an Aerosolized 35% Triethylene Glycol and Water Mixture from Fog Machines Directed Anti-Parallel Along the Length of a Novel Downdraft Table (Version 1). figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19890247.v1
Zdilla MJ, Goldsmith WT, Nurkiewicz TR. 2022c. Removal of an Aerosolized 35% Triethylene Glycol and Water Mixture from Fog Machines Directed Parallel Along the Length of a Novel Downdraft Table (Version 1). figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19890238.v1
Zdilla MJ, Goldsmith WT, Nurkiewicz TR. 2022d. Removal of an Aerosolized 35% Triethylene Glycol and Water Mixture from Fog Machines Directed Toward One Another in the Center of a Novel Downdraft Table (Version 1). figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19890232.v1
Zdilla MJ, Goldsmith WT, Nurkiewicz TR. 2022e. Removal of an Aerosolized Glycerin and Water Mixture from a Hand-Held Fog Generator by a Novel Downdraft Table (Version 1). figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19890244.v1
Zdilla MJ, Goldsmith WT, Nurkiewicz TR. 2022f. Removal of Cool Water Vapor Generated from an Ultrasonic Air Humidifier by a Novel Downdraft Table (Version 1). figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19890241.v1
Zdilla MJ, Goldsmith WT, Nurkiewicz TR. 2022g. Removal of Water Vapor Produced from Condensation Occurring Post-Sublimation of Dry Ice by a Novel Downdraft Table (Version 1). figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19890235.v1
Zieliński J, Przybylski J. Ile wody tracimy z oddechem? [How much water is lost during breathing?]. Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2012;80(4):339-342.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Proceedings of the West Virginia Academy of Science applies the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) license to works we publish. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.