Academically Improved Students due to Peer-Teaching and Classroom Engagement

Authors

  • Nadira Ghattas West Virginia Academy
  • Erica Harvey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55632/pwvas.v97i3.1213

Keywords:

Peer-teaching, self confidence, academic performance, peer communication

Abstract

Active student engagement in classrooms and peer-teaching are examples of techniques that have been reported to enhance students’ academic performance, peer-communication, and sense of belonging in classrooms. This paper examines college students’ experience with peer-teaching in a first-year chemistry class that used a flipped-classroom method. Students self-selected into groups with 2-5 members each, and the groups signed up on a rotating basis to present and teach their peers different topics throughout the semester. Peer-teaching was conducted under the supervision and in the presence of the course instructors. Students filled out a survey after every class meeting to evaluate the presenting group and the level of understanding of the presented material. Survey results highlight valuable effects of peer teaching; students reported that peer-teaching presentations helped them improve in areas related to their academic performance (26%), academic understanding (23%), self-confidence (23%), STEM interest and persistence (~7%), and most especially their communication skills with their peers in their assigned groups (78%). The results of this study have implications for educators who wish to enhance students’ engagement and academic performance in classrooms.

References

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science,

engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Olson, S., & Riordan, D. G. (2012). Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President. Executive Office of the President. Retrieved from

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541511.pdf

Öz, E. (2024). Effects of peer instruction on academic achievement: a meta-analysis Pedagogies: An International Journal,19(4),505–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2023.2246447

Roy K. and Swargiary, K. 2024.Effectiveness of peer teaching in enhancing academic performance, engagement, and social-emotional outcomes among high school students: A Quasi-experimental study. Researchgate. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.28650.32965

Rusli, M., Degeng, I., Setyosari, P., and Sulton. 2021 Peer teaching: Students teaching students to increase academic performance. Teach Theol Relig. 24:17-27 https://doi.org/101111/teth.12549

Watkins, J., & Mazur, E. (2013). Retaining Students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Majors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst13_042_05_36

Whitman, N.1988. Teaching: To Teach is To Learn Twice By ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-05

How to Cite

Ghattas, N., & Harvey, E. (2025). Academically Improved Students due to Peer-Teaching and Classroom Engagement. Proceedings of the West Virginia Academy of Science, 97(3). https://doi.org/10.55632/pwvas.v97i3.1213